Monday 27 June 2016

Job hunting is not a job, but entrepreneurship

If you have ever searched a job for a long time, probably you have already hearded that job hunting is itself a job. It requires many time, effort discipline and following a schedule. 



During the last years, I have spent time both searching jobs and entrepreneuring and, according to that experience, I can add new information about this topic. 


I think that job hunting looks more like entrepreneurship than a regular job





What are the similarities between job hunting and entrepreneurship?


- No boss

When we search a job or we entrepreneur we don't have a boss or mentor who tells us what we have to do. Everything we do comes from our own iniciative. 

We don't really have schedules and we don't have a place to go everyday, we do our tasks whenever and wherever we want or we find convenient, and we focus on what we think is important. 


- Need to sale

In most of the regular jobs, but those that are comercial positions, we don't have to convince anyone to buy anything. 

When we search a job, our main goal is convincing someone to buy our product, in this case our work. 

The entrepreneur needs to sell its product to clients too, besides developing his product. 


- No sales, no food

In a regular job, you meet the schedule and the tasks and you get your salary. When you search a job or you are entrepreneuring, if you don't get sales, you don't get income, no matter the effort or time spent. 





To sum up


Job hunting and entrepreneurship are really similar. They need specific skills and habits that are not required for many jobs. 

Job hunting has been really hard during the last years, almost as hard as entrepreneurship is, and it does not look like it will improve soon. 

Anyone needs to get the required skills to manage oneself, sell its product and get new contacts, even if considering just getting a job, because it is not easy and simple to get one. 



Friday 10 June 2016

Meritocracy

What is meritocrazy?

It is a social organization that grants the highest acknowledgement, status and awards to those who do things better and provide society with better results. 



Is it usual?


Meritocrazy is less usual than we could expect. 

Every person wants to achieve the highest acknowledgement, status and award for himself and his relatives, regardless if they deserve it or not. 

That means that we are not really interested in awarding those who really deserve it. Even more, we could think that these people is a threat to us, and we could consider sabotaging them and taking their deserved award. 



In which circumstances do we award those who do things better?



Nevertheless, there are circumstances where there is no other choice than awarding the best ones. 

We need to award and acknowledge the best ones when we have a hard competition with other organitzations or when our situation is really critically. In this situations, we eager to win the competition or to solve our critical problems. Only the best ones can help us. 


Football is highly meritocratic. You won't be in the best team unless you were the best


A clear example is professional football, where the bests have the best positions and get the highest ackowledgement and award. We will not find relatives of important people in any professional team squad (unless they really deserve). If you don't have the best, you will be defeated and your fans will leave you. A team without fans is pointless.